SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Preet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's custody and nature of protest. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments regarding incitement and applicability of law. (Para 2 , 3 , 8 , 9)
3. court's order for bail release. (Para 10)
4. disposition of the petition and order upload. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. By this petition, the petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 152/2021 under Section 188 /269/270/153-A IPC, 3 Epidemics Disease Act and 51(b) of Disaster Management Act registered at PS Connaught Place.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is in custody in the above-noted FIR since 10th August, 2021 and all offences except Section 153-a IPC are bailable offences. Further, even going through the various video footages, the petitioner while giving his interview to the Press or making any statement has not passed any offensive remarks against any particular religion which could incite violence and hence has committed no offence under Section 153-a IPC. As per the footages available the event took place from 10.00 AM to 11.45 AM when no offence under Section 153-a IPC was committed and the petitioner had left the spot at around 2.00 PM. Thus the slog

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top