SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vipin Sanghi, Rekha Palli, JJ.
Shakti Jan Sudhar Samiti, Delhi (NGO) - Appellant
Versus
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2302 of 2021 & CM Appl. 6701 of 2021
Decided On : 21-09-2021




The court upheld that tender eligibility criteria should not be excessively onerous and affirmed that judicial interference is limited to cases where terms are arbitrary or discriminatory.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Eligibility and Turnover Criteria for tenders - The writ petition challenged the criteria in 24 Notices Inviting Tenders issued by the Respondent for operation and management of Jan Suvidha Complexes - Petitioner argued criteria was onerous and excluded genuine participants - Court found no arbitrary or unreasonable conditions that hindered fair competition - Judicial review affirmed to be restrained in determining tender terms - Dismissed the petition, allowing the existing tender conditions. (Paras 17-32)

(B) Judicial Review - Scope - Courts do not interfere unless terms are arbitrary, discriminatory, or mala fide - Judicial restraint emphasized in tender conditions evaluation. (Paras 17 and 31)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, an NGO, has managed Jan Suvidha complexes since 1998 and challenged criteria limiting tenders to private companies. The impugned NITs set stringent experience and turnover requirements, which the petitioner claimed excluded capable NGOs from participation. The respondent claimed financial criteria were justifiable for contractor capabilities. Relevant past OMs were also discussed regarding eligibility criteria.

Findings of Court:
Court upheld the respondent's eligibility criteria as not excessive or discriminatory, determining competitive bidding is vital for public tenders. Assertion that conditions infringe fair competition lacked merit.

Issues: The central issues involved whether the specified eligibility criteria were unjustifiably exclusionary for viable bidders, alongside the appropriateness of turnover calculations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court examined existing criteria, determining they did not obstruct fair competition or create arbitrary barriers, thus were permissible for ensuring contractor capacity.

Result: Petition dismissed, affirming existing tender criteria.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assails the Eligibility and Turnover Criteria prescribed in 24 Notices Inviting Tenders (NITs) issued by the Respondent/Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB), GNCTD between 11.02.2021 to 15.02.2021 for operation, management, and maintenance of Jan Suvidha Complexes.

Brief Facts:

2. The Petitioner society is an NGO registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and claims to have been carrying out the operation, management, and maintenance of Jan Suvidha complexes since 09.07.1998. The Respondent/Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) has been constructing Jan Suvidha complexes for providing basic civic amenities to the citizens of Delhi, especially in the slum areas. Over the years, Jan Suvidha Complexes have been allotted to various NGOs/private companies through issuance of tenders by the Respondent, where the tendered work mainly revolves around the operation, management and maintenance of these complexes.

3. Initially, these Jan Suvidha complexes were available to the public only on a "Pay and Use" basis, which required them to pay a nominal charge for using the service. However, the Respondent introduced a `Free User Charge' Scheme, in pursuance of its decision to make free-of-cost community toilets available to persons living in slums. A Notice Inviting Quotations (NIQ) was issued on 19.12.2017 for the operation, management and maintenance of such toilet complexes. The NIQ concluded by allotting the work to various NGOs/Societies, including the petitioner herein. It is the petitioner's claim that since its work was found to be satisfactory, the Respondent extended its contract till 27.11.2018.

4. Thereafter, fresh tenders were invited, which were awarded to private companies instead of NGOs for two years, and now a fresh Tender process has been initiated, vide the impugned 24 NITs from 11.02.2021 to 15.02.2021. According to the petitioner, the system of awarding the work to private companies did not prove to be successful, and thus led to the issuance of the impugned 24 NITs seeking to award the work pertaining to these Jan Suvidha complexes to the NGOs/societies once again.

5. The petitioner has assailed the Eligibility and Turnover Criteria in all the 24 NITs, which have similar terms and conditions. The relevant extracts from one of the NITs is being reproduced herein below.

    "

A. Scope of Work

NOTICE INVITING TENDER

    NIT No. 36/Ex. Eng. C-4/DUSIB/2020-21 Dated 13.02.2021 Tender ID no.2021_DUSIB_200116_1

    The Executive Engineer,C-4, DUSIB as per orders on account of division C-4 on behalf of DUSIB invites Item Rate e-tender in two envelopes/two bid system (both bids to be uploaded simultaneously), from the registered NGOs/agencies of following categories:

    a) Youth and Women's Community based groups

    b) Universities and Institutions

    c) Nehru YuvaKendras

    d) Unorganized worker's Trade Union

    e) NGOs and CSOs registered under Societies Registration act 1860 and Trust acts or other similar laws of the state Governments

    f) Self Help groups and Committees recognized by the state Governments

    g) Resident Welfare Associations

    Who essentially fulfills requisite "Eligibility Criteria", for the under mentioned work

    xxx

    The Consortium of not more than 5 Agencies/NGOs (as per conditions at Annexure-C) is allowed to participate in the tender for this work. The NGOs/Agencies shall be any of the categories enumerated above from a) to g).

    The tender has two components namely Part-A & Part-B.

    Part-A (Part A-1 + Part A-2) includes wages of stipulated labour (i.e. Part A-1), Applicable bonus if any and contribution of employer towards EPF & ESI (i.e. Part A-2)

    Part-B includes electricity consumption charges, T&P, machines/jet machine, Upkeep of sanitary napkin dispenser and sanitary pad incinerator in ladies section (sanitary napkin dispenser and sanitary pad incinerator shall be provided by department as per requirem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top