Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Hell Energy Magyarorszag KFT – Appellant
Versus
Shri Brahm Shakti Prince Beverages Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's trademark infringement claims and background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. reference to mediation for dispute resolution. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's acceptance of settlement and court fee refund. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. precedents for court fee refund. (Para 7) |
| 5. final decree and disposal of pending applications. (Para 9) |
1. Plaintiff has preferred the present suit under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 CPC as well as under Sections 27 to 29, 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 seeking permanent injunction from infringement/ unauthorized use of trade name/trade mark/trade dress/copy right/passing of/dilution and damages/rendition of accounts of profit against the defendant.
2. Plaintiff claims to be in the business of production and sale of energy drinks and beverages under the brand name "HELL ENERGY" and having obtained registration in respect of trade mark for the goods "beer; mineral and aerated waters; other non-alcoholic beverages; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages", in Hungary and other countries. Plaintiff claims to have obtained amassed an enviable position in the industry all over the world. Pl
Parties to a trade mark dispute can resolve their issues through mediation, and when a suit is settled, the plaintiff is entitled to a full refund of court fees.
The court upheld the validity of the Settlement Agreement and allowed the refund of entire court fees in accordance with Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.
A settlement agreement reached by parties in trademark disputes is valid and can lead to a decree in its terms, including the refund of court fees based on amicable resolution.
Settlement agreements reached through mediation are binding and enforceable, and parties are entitled to court fee refunds when disputes are amicably resolved.
Parties may resolve disputes through a valid Settlement Agreement, which the court can incorporate into a decree, and the plaintiff may be entitled to a refund of court fees upon settlement.
The court confirmed the validity of a mediated Settlement Agreement resolving trademark infringement, establishing entitlement to court fee refund under precedent cases.
The court decreed the suit in terms of the valid and lawful Settlement Agreement and granted the plaintiff a refund of the entire court fees based on previous court decisions.
Enforcement of Settlement Agreement reached through mediation and entitlement to refund of court fees.
The court applied the Settlement Agreement dated 03.08.2021 and found it to be valid and lawful, decreeing the suit in terms of the agreement. The plaintiff was also entitled to a refund of entire co....
The court affirmed the validity of a settlement agreement reached through mediation, allowing for a decree based on that settlement and partial refund of court fees paid, citing provisions under the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
