SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Najmi Waziri, J.
Nidhi Malik - Appellant
Versus
Alapan Bandyopadhyay - Respondent
CONT.CAS(C) 293 of 2021
Decided On : 12-10-2021




Judicial orders must be complied with promptly by government departments to maintain the rule of law; failure to comply may constitute contempt, allowing courts to enforce compliance through consequential orders.

Headnote:(A) Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 11 and 12 - Disobedience of court orders - Petition filed for initiating contempt proceedings against State for failure to comply with previous orders regarding cadre transfer - Court reiterates that compliance with judicial orders is mandatory and non-compliance may constitute contempt. (Paras 1, 22, 25)

(B) Hierarchical compliance in administrative matters - The court emphasizes that government departments must adhere to court orders without unnecessary delay, reflecting on past instances where consistent non-compliance was challenged. (Paras 6, 19)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought contempt proceedings against the State for not issuing a relieving order for cadre transfer from West Bengal to AGMUT despite multiple court orders affirming her entitlement to such transfer based on the marriage policy. The State cited delays and officer shortages as reasons for non-compliance.

Findings of Court:
The court found the State's non-compliance with its previous orders to be contemptuous. The petitioner is directed to be relieved from IAS Cadre of West Bengal within one week, with the prior orders set aside for failure to issue a relieving order. The responsibility lies with the State to facilitate timely compliance with court directives.

Issues: The main issue is whether the State's failure to comply with court orders constitutes contempt and the obligation of the State to act on decisions regarding cadre transfers.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that government departments must honor court orders. Lethargy or delays in compliance are unacceptable and grounds for contempt proceedings. The court held that previous dismissals should not impede compliance with the directives, emphasizing the protection of judicial authority and the rule of law.

Result: Petition granted; the petitioner to be relieved within one week.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks contempt proceedings against respondent for non-compliance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. respondent argues compliance with prior order; claims legitimate reasons. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court emphasizes duty of compliance with prior orders. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. non-compliance undermines rule of law and court authority. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. petitioner granted relief; respondent to act accordingly. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT

Najmi Waziri, J. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, 1949, seeking, inter alia, the following reliefs:-

    "(i) Initiate contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnor for willfully and deliberately disobeying the judgment and Order dated 06.01.2021 of this Hon'ble Court passed in the W.P.(C) No.10874 of 2020 and further direct the Respondent to pass a fresh order in compliance of the said Order;"

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 06.01.2021 passed by the Division Bench in W.P.(C) No. 10874/2020 leaves no scope for the State of West Bengal to consider the matter on merits but to issue a release order in view of the two orders as mentioned by the Division Bench in its aforesaid order, which is reproduced as under:

    "...Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:

    "1. Allow the present Petition and pass an appropriate writ, order or direction to set aside the impugned Order dated 01.12.2020 passed by the Ld. Central Administrative, Principal bench, New Delhi in MA/100/2252/2020;

    2. Consequently, direct that the prayer (s) made in the Original Application of the Petitioner as filed before the Ld. CAT, Principal bench, New Delhi be allowed;

    3. Consequently, direct the Respondent no. 1 to grant No objection/approval to the Petitioner for transfer of her cadre from West Bengal cadre to AGMUT Cadre and accordingly direct for passing of relieving orders in favour of the petitioner in a time bound manner;

    4. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice."

    2. However, after some arguments, learned counsel for petitioner confines his prayer to prayer (ii) made in the OA filed along with M.A.No. 100/2252/2020. The said prayer clause is reproduced hereinbelow:-

    (ii.) In the alternative, issue an appropriate order directing the Respondent no. 2 to act on the Application of the Applicant dated 10.08.2020 (Annexure A-18) and grant consent/letter of No objection and consequential relieving order for the Transfer of cadre of the Applicant from West Bengal cadre to AGMUT Cadre;

    3. Issue notice.

    4. Mr. Vijay Joshi, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Ms. Madhumita Bhattarcharjee, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2.

    5. They state that in view of the limited prayer now sought before this Court, they do not wish to file any counter affidavit.

    6. It is pertinent to mention that the Tribunal by way of the impugned order has dismissed the petitioner's O.A. on the ground of delay as far as challenge to order dated 25th May, 2016 of the respondent No.2 is concerned. However, the petitioner had been given liberty to pursue her fresh application seeking transfer of the cadre.

    7. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide the petitioner's second representation dated 10th August, 2020 within eight weeks in accordance with the order dated 06th November, 2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench in O.A.3863/2018 as well as order dated 04th December, 2020 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench in O.A. No.3579/2019 and the judgment and order dated 03rd February, 2020 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 13444/2020.

    8. It is clarified that the dismissal of the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top