SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Mohd. Naved – Appellant
Versus
Farha Rehman – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 35023/2021 (for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

C.R.P. 71/2021 & CM APPL. 35022/2021 (for stay)

3. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 28th August, 2021, passed by the ld. ASCJ, Karkardooma Courts Delhi in CS No. 734/18 titled Farha Rehman v. Mohd. Naved, by which an application under Order XXIII Rule I (3) (b), CPC filed by the Plaintiff/Respondent herein, has been allowed. Vide the impugned order, the Plaintiff has been allowed to withdraw the suit, with liberty to file a fresh one. The relevant extract of the impugned order is set out below:

    "Therefore, having considered the stage of the present suit, multiple causes of action, sought to be arrayed by the plaintiff in a fresh suit and the case laws discussed above, this court in the interest of justice and for filing comprehensive suit covering all possible disputes between parties related to all subject matters even beyond that of present suit between them under relevant law, finds that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission to the plainti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top