DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Mohd. Naved – Appellant
Versus
Farha Rehman – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
CM APPL. 35023/2021 (for exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.
C.R.P. 71/2021 & CM APPL. 35022/2021 (for stay)
3. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 28th August, 2021, passed by the ld. ASCJ, Karkardooma Courts Delhi in CS No. 734/18 titled Farha Rehman v. Mohd. Naved, by which an application under Order XXIII Rule I (3) (b), CPC filed by the Plaintiff/Respondent herein, has been allowed. Vide the impugned order, the Plaintiff has been allowed to withdraw the suit, with liberty to file a fresh one. The relevant extract of the impugned order is set out below:
"Therefore, having considered the stage of the present suit, multiple causes of action, sought to be arrayed by the plaintiff in a fresh suit and the case laws discussed above, this court in the interest of justice and for filing comprehensive suit covering all possible disputes between parties related to all subject matters even beyond that of present suit between them under relevant law, finds that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission to the plainti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.