SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Mohd. Naved – Appellant
Versus
Farha Rehman – Respondent


Table of Content
1. withdrawal of suit with liberty to file fresh (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments against granting withdrawal permission (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12)
3. court's observations on legal grounds (Para 11 , 14 , 17)
4. interpretation of 'sufficient grounds' under cpc (Para 19 , 29)
5. dismissing the revision petition (Para 32)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 35023/2021 (for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

C.R.P. 71/2021 & CM APPL. 35022/2021 (for stay)

3. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 28th August, 2021, passed by the ld. ASCJ, Karkardooma Courts Delhi in CS No. 734/18 titled Farha Rehman v. Mohd. Naved, by which an application under Order XXIII Rule I (3) (b), CPC filed by the Plaintiff/Respondent herein, has been allowed. Vide the impugned order, the Plaintiff has been allowed to withdraw the suit, with liberty to file a fresh one. The relevant extract of the impugned order is set out below:

    "Therefore, having considered the stage of the present suit, multiple causes of action, sought to be arrayed by the plaintiff in a fresh suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top