SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. intent and details of arbitration clause. (Para 1 , 2)
2. disputes arising during the contract's execution. (Para 3 , 4)
3. objections from iocl regarding jurisdiction. (Para 5)
4. petitioner's arguments regarding jurisdiction. (Para 6)
5. interpretation of 'venue' versus 'seat' in arbitration. (Para 7 , 8 , 12)
6. supreme court rulings clarifying jurisdiction. (Para 9 , 10)
7. parties' intention regarding arbitration venue. (Para 11 , 14)
8. exclusive jurisdiction at guwahati. (Para 13)
9. court's dismissal based on jurisdiction. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Sanjeev Narula, J. The present petition under Section 11 (4) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter, `the Act'] seeks appointment of an Arbitrator in terms of Clause 9.0.0.0 of the General Conditions of Contract [hereinafter, `GCC'], incorporated by way of reference under a Letter of Award dated 22nd September, 2016 [hereinafter, `LoA'], whereunder, a Work Order1 was issued to the Petitioner for carrying out the works of "Residual Process Design, Engineering, Detailed Engineering (including HAZOP Study), Procurement, Supply, Fabrication, Inspection, Transportation, St

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top