SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Franco Leone Limited – Appellant
Versus
Punjab and Sind Bank – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding notice and auction procedures (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 15)
3. court's reasoning on notice compliance and auction participation (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. conclusion and dismissal of the petition (Para 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the auction notice dated 1st September, 2021 and consequential proceedings emanating therefrom under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act).

2. Brief facts leading up to the filing of the present petition are that the petitioner no.1 (petitioner company), of which petitioners no. 2 to 4 are directors, availed various credit facilities from the respondent bank. To avail such credit facilities, the petitioner company had mortgaged 12 properties with the respondent bank. On 31st March, 2018, the account of the petitioner company was declared to be Non Performing Asset (NPA) and a demand notice dated 5th May, 2018 was issued to the petitioners by the respondent bank under Secti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top