IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
CPL Sandeep Krishnan UK - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 12946 of 2021 & C.M. No. 40778 of 2021
Decided On : 17-11-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to denial of medical posting. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's medical history and requests. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's criteria for interference with postings. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed due to lack of urgency. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J.: (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned orders dated 26th February 2021 and 28th May 2021 whereby the Petitioner's request for posting on medical grounds was declined. Petitioner also seeks directions to the Respondents to grant posting to the Petitioner on Medical Grounds at his hometown i.e. Thiruvananthapuram.
3. In the alternative, Petitioner seeks posting on medical grounds to any other place in the southern region having a moderate climate and requisite paraphernalia at the Military Hospital.
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner was enrolled in the Indian Air Force on 3rd April 2013 as an Airman. She states that the Petitioner, while serving with the Air Warrior Drill Team, was severely injured on his left knee during one of the drill practice sessions and soon after he got injured on the right knee as well due to which the Petitioner was diagnosed with "Chondromalacia Patella" and was placed in medical category A4G4(p).
5. She states that subsequently the Petitioner's trade was changed by the Respondents to Adm. Asst. and he was posted to the Para Troopers Training School, Agra w.e.f. 15th January 2018. She points out that in the year 2019, the Petitioner began experiencing shortness of breath and due to heavy cold climatic conditions as well as due to dust and other pollutant particles, the Petitioner's breathing issues have aggravated.
6. She points out that the Petitioner was diagnosed with Bronchial Asthma w.e.f January 2020 and was advised to undergo treatment for the same. She states that since no pulmonologist is available at Military Hospital, Agra, the treatment given to the Petitioner by the medical specialist is merely symptomatic and has not led to any improvement in his health.
7. She also states that the Petitioner applied for a posting on medical grounds to a unit in the southern region with moderate climate conditions vide application dated 15th December 2020 but the same was rejected by the Air Force Records Office [AFRO] citing HRP limitations. She further points out that the Petitioner preferred another application dated 24th March 2021 but to no avail.
8. Having heard learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court is of the view that posting of Airman falls within the exclusive purview of Air Force Records Office and Courts are normally reluctant to interfere with the same unless and until the same is contrary to law and/or the facts of the case are `so gross' that they warrant interference by a Court in writ jurisdiction.
9. It is pertinent to mention that this Court has been entertaining the writ petitions for transfer only in extreme cases where the Airman or his immediate family members are suffering from life threatening disease(s) or are disabled.
10. In the present case, this Court finds that the Petitioner is suffering from Bronchial Asthma, which is very common in North India. The alleged disease is not of such a nature that would warrant a transfer in writ jurisdiction. Since in the present case, neither the petitioner nor his immediate family members are suffering from any life threatening disease, the present writ petition along with pending application is dismissed.
Judicial intervention in military postings is limited to cases with life-threatening or severe health conditions, emphasizing the exclusive discretion of military authorities.
Compassionate grounds for posting must consider the medical needs of dependents requiring constant supervision and assistance.
The court mandated the expeditious processing of a discharge application, highlighting the need for reasonable accommodation for personnel with disabilities and family obligations under similar circu....
Courts may not interfere with transfer as an exigency of service, but decisions denying discharge must be reasoned.
The High Court ruled that while service transfers are generally not interfered with, discharge applications must include adequate reasoning, necessitating reconsideration of the Petitioner’s request.
Jurisdiction over premature retirement resides with the Armed Forces Tribunal, and procedural policies cannot be overridden by this Court without compelling reasons.
The needs and necessities of an individual in the Armed Forces are subservient to the needs of the Army, and postings are determined based on various factors, balancing the needs of the service with ....
The main legal point established is that in cases of transfer on medical grounds, the court will consider the petitioner's compliance with standing orders and the medical assessment of fitness for tr....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering the delicate physical health condition of personnel and adhering to transfer guidelines when making transfer and p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.