Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
PNC-TRG (JV) – Appellant
Versus
National Highways Authority of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. extension of arbitration mandate. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. counsel's request for extension and acceptance. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's decision on the extension. (Para 9 , 10) |
IA No. 15014/2021 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 168/2021
3. The present petition under Sections 29 A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed seeking extension of mandate of the arbitral tribunal adjudicating the disputes between the parties.
4. Pertinently, Petitioner, PNC-TRG (JV), a Joint Venture between M/s. PNC Infratech Ltd. (formerly known as M/S PNC Construction Co. Ltd) and respondent-National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) with regard to certain disputes arising out of a contract dated 19.9.2007, for the work of four laning of Km 51.00 to Km. 61.00 (including Chambal Bridge) on Dholpur-Morena Section of NH-3 on North-South corridor in the States of Rajasthan/Madhya Pradesh (Contract package No. NS-1/RJ-MP/1), had entered into an arbitration. The Arbitral Tribunal was held on 24.10.2018 (with Corrigendum dated 26.10.2018).
5. As per averments made in Para-5(x
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
