Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
VLS Commodities P. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sadhna Mehrotra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on succession petition and company status (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. reasons for dismissal of application and objections (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding rights to cross-examine (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's analysis on procedural validity and rights (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. legal standards for succession certificates (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. implications of not granting succession certificates (Para 19 , 20) |
| 7. final order and costs imposed (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
1. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns two orders dated 27th March, 2021 passed by the Administrative Civil Judge, South-East, Saket Court, New Delhi in Succ. Court No.1554/16, whereby the application filed on behalf of the petitioner Company, inter alia, seeking impleadment in the succession proceedings and permitting the petitioner Company to cross-examine the respondent no.1, PW-1 in the succession proceedings, has been dismissed. Furthermore, the objections filed on behalf of the petitioner Company have also been dismissed.
2. Submissions of the parties were heard on 13th September, 2021 and on 17th November, 2021, when the judgment was reserved.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
