Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Atul Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
India Infoline Home Finance Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments from both parties regarding delay. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observations on the necessity of condonation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. ratio decidendi concerning discretion in condoning delay. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. conclusion and dismissal of the petition. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)--The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 23rd January, 2020 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ), Dwarka Courts, Delhi in Civil Suit No.439/2019, whereby the application for condonation of delay filed on behalf of the respondent/defendant no.2, in respect of filing the memo of appearance, has been allowed subject to costs of Rs.10,000/-.
2. The facts in the present petition are not in dispute and are stated below:
2.1. The suit was filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for recovery in May 2019 under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).
2.2. The summons were served on the respondent/defendant on 12th June, 2019 and thereafter, dates were fixed in the matter on 20th August, 2019, 19th October, 2019 and 5th December, 2019, when the counsel for t
The discretion to condone delay under the Limitation Act is based on the explanation provided, not strictly on the length of the delay, emphasizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of 'sufficient cause' under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and the emphasis on advancing substantial justice.
A change of counsel does not constitute a sufficient cause for condoning significant, inordinate delays in procedural filings, such as the submission of a written statement. Courts will not excuse su....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the delay in filing an appeal must be accompanied by a sufficient cause and a demonstration of diligence in pursuing the remedy, as negligence....
The main legal point established is the application of the principles of sufficient cause and the liberal approach in delay condonation cases, emphasizing the need to advance substantial justice and ....
The court emphasized that applications for condonation of delay should be decided on merits, prioritizing substantial justice over technicalities, especially when the delay is not due to negligence.
The court affirmed that delays in non-commercial suits should be condoned leniently to ensure justice and that denying a party's right to a defense must be carefully evaluated.
The court upheld the condonation of delay in filing an appeal, emphasizing a liberal approach in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and prior court directions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
