SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
India Awake for Transparency – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application for writ of quo warranto. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments against technical member's qualifications. (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondent's counterarguments on qualifications. (Para 5 , 6)
4. petitioner's lack of standing. (Para 7)
5. court's findings on petitioner's absence of locus standi. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
6. dismissal of the petition and costs imposed. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)

CM APPL. Nos.21172/2021 & 32219/2021 (Exemptions)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Applications stand disposed of.

CM APPL. No.32218/2021 (Intervention)

Present application has been filed by M/s. Hasham Investment and Trading Company Private Limited seeking intervention in the present matter.

For the reasons stated in the memo of the application, this application is hereby allowed and intervention is permitted.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 1810/2020 & CM APPL. Nos.6302/2020, 20845/2020 & 21171/2021

1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto directing Respondent No.2 to set out the Authority under which the said Respondent is holding office as Technical Member of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top