SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Ankush Auto Deals – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of DGST – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks refund of taxes. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner cites relevant legal provisions. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court accepts respondents' undertaking. (Para 5 , 6)
4. writ petition disposed with directions. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

C.M.No.38294/2021

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.12233/2021

1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. By way of the present petition, the Petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to issue refund of Rs.25,29,944/- (SGST Rs.12,64,972/- +CGST Rs.12,64,972/-) as well as to grant interest on the refund amount from the date immediately after the expiry of sixty days from the date of receipt of application in FORM RFD-01 till the date of refund and grant exemplary damages to petitioner as the respondents has acted in mala fide exercise of power in withholding the refund.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that in terms of Section 54(7), it is incumbent upon the proper officer to issue the refund order within sixty days from the date of receipt of application of refund complete in all respects. He further sub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top