SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Devendra Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Goel – Respondent


Table of Content
1. impleadment of a new defendant (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. settlement agreement resolution (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. decree in favor of resolved parties (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. court fee refund principles (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
5. final decree and dismissal (Para 19)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

I.A. 15997/2021

1. Present application has been filed by the plaintiffs under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC seeking impleadment of Mr.Ranjit Bansali, proprietor of Oswal Electricals as defendant to the present suit.

2. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs submits that at the time of filing the present suit, the plaintiffs were under the bona fide impression that the defendant No. 1 was operating from the premises located at BA-15, Phase 2, Truck Market, Mangolpuri Industrial Area, Delhi-110083. However, during the execution of the Local Commission on 24.09.2021, the plaintiffs came to know that the said premise was controlled and operated by the proposed defendant no.2 and not by defendant no.1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff further submits that now no relief qua defendant No.1 is sought and thereby, his name be deleted from the Array of Parties mentioned in the Amended Me

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top