SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Manohar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Tara Chand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Both these petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning orders of the Trial Court, whereby the applications of the petitioners/defendants [hereinafter `defendants'] for placing on record documents, have been dismissed.

2. In CM(M) 951/2021, the defendant has impugned orders passed by the Civil Judge-03, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, being (i) the order dated 10th October, 2019, whereby the application of the defendants under Order VIII Rule 1A and Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been dismissed; and, (ii) the order dated 26th February, 2020, whereby the review of the aforesaid application preferred by the defendants has been dismissed.

3. In CM(M) 1066/2021, the defendants have impugned the order dated 09th November, 2021 passed by the Civil Judge-03, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, whereby the application filed on behalf of the defendants under Order XIII Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC has been dismissed.

4. CM(M) 951/2021 came up for hearing on 28th October, 2021, when the counsel for the defendants apprised this Court of the application filed on behalf of the defendants under Order XIII

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top