Defendants' failure to show due diligence and timely filing of documents justifies dismissal of their applications under the Code of Civil Procedure and no grounds were shown for High Court intervention under Article 227.

JUDGMENT

1. Both these petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning orders of the Trial Court, whereby the applications of the petitioners/defendants [hereinafter `defendants'] for placing on record documents, have been dismissed.

2. In CM(M) 951/2021, the defendant has impugned orders passed by the Civil Judge-03, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, being (i) the order dated 10th October, 2019, whereby the application of the defendants under Order VIII Rule 1A and Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been dismissed; and, (ii) the order dated 26th February, 2020, whereby the review of the aforesaid application preferred by the defendants has been dismissed.

3. In CM(M) 1066/2021, the defendants have impugned the order dated 09th November, 2021 passed by the Civil Judge-03, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, whereby the application filed on behalf of the defendants under Order XIII Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC has been dismissed.

4. CM(M) 951/2021 came up for hearing on 28th October, 2021, when the counsel for the defendants apprised this Court of the application filed on behalf of the defendants under Order XIII Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC, which was listed for orders before the Trial Court. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned to 29th November, 2021 and CM(M) 1066/2021 challenging the order dated 09th November, 2021 was tagged with the aforesaid petition. Arguments were heard in both the petitions on 29th November, 2021 and judgment was reserved.

5. Both the captioned petitions are between the same parties and in relation to the same suit and therefore, are being disposed of by a common judgment.

6. Before dealing with the submissions of the parties, it is deemed appropriate to detail the facts preceding the filing of the present petitions.

6.1. The suit from which the present petitions arise was filed on 19th April, 1995 by the respondents/plaintiffs [hereinafter `plaintiffs'] against the defendants for mandatory and permanent injunction.

6.2. Written statement was filed by the defendants 4th May, 1995 and replication was filed on 16th August, 1995.

6.3. Thereafter, issues were framed in the suit on 1st April, 2004 and evidence by way of affidavit of evidence of PW1 and PW2 was filed on 14th May, 2004, which was finally closed on 05th September, 2018.

6.4. On 23rd February, 2019, the Trial Court allowed the application of the defendants for filing list of witnesses, subject to costs of Rs.8,000/- as it was filed at a belated stage.

6.5. The matter was put up for defendants' evidence and on 03rd June, 2019, the Trial Court was informed by the counsel for the defendants that the documents sought to be relied on by the defendants were not on record. Therefore, the counsel for the defendants sough time to inspect the court file.

6.6. Counsel for the defendants moved an application under Order VIII Rule 1A and Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the CPC in August, 2019 for placing on record two sale deeds dated 16th February, 1987.

6.7. Reply to the application was filed on 16th August, 2019 by the plaintiffs in opposition to the said application.

6.8. Arguments were heard on the application under Order VIII Rule 1A of the CPC by the Trial Court and vide the impugned ord