Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Manohar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Tara Chand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions under article 227 impugning lower court orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. detailed background of the suit and previous proceedings. (Para 6) |
| 3. trial court's reasoning for dismissing applications. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. defendants' arguments regarding document admission. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. court observes delay and negligence by defendants. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. due diligence required for document submission. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. court's findings on defendants' failure to act timely. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. assessment of supporting jurisprudence and relevance. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. limitation of article 227 jurisdiction. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 10. orders dismissed with costs. (Para 27) |
JUDGMENT
1. Both these petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning orders of the Trial Court, whereby the applications of the petitioners/defendants [hereinafter `defendants'] for placing on record documents, have been dismissed.
2. In CM(M) 951/2021, the defendant has impugned orders passed by the Civil Judge-03, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, being (i) the order dated 10th October, 2019, whereby the application of the defendants under Order VIII Rule 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
