SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Swatantra Kumar Jaysawal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. allegations of sexual assault and detailed background. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. parties have amicably settled; state expresses concern. (Para 10 , 11)
3. seriousness of offences against societal norms. (Para 12 , 13)
4. high court's guidelines on not quashing serious offences. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. the petition is dismissed. (Para 21)

ORDER

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing and cancelling the FIR No. 219/2021 under Section 376 /323/506 IPC registered at P.S. Patparganj Industrial Area and all the proceedings thereof.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 25.06.2021 an information from PCR vide DD No.54A was received at PS Patparganj Industrial Area, wherein it was reported that Complainant was not telling anything about complaint but asking for urgent police assistance. Accordingly, IO SI Moolchand reached the place of incident i.e. ICD Patparganj Custom office and met the complainant, who told that she had a scuffle with her male friend Swatantra (petitioner here

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top