Eldyne Electro System Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Table of Content
1. correction of officer's designation (Para 1 , 2)
2. petition for final disposal accepted (Para 3 , 4)
3. petition challenges delisting order (Para 5)
4. arguments against delisting process and lack of notice (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
5. opposition to jurisdiction and maintainability (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
6. territorial jurisdiction for petition (Para 17 , 18)
7. cause of action arises in delhi (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
8. reference to supreme court judgment on jurisdiction (Para 23 , 24)
9. guidelines for temporary delisting and delisting (Para 25 , 26)
10. procedural requirements for temporary delisting (Para 27 , 28)
11. difference in procedures for delisting (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
12. seriousness of consequences in delisting (Para 32 , 33 , 34)
13. banning of business provisions (Para 35 , 36 , 37)
14. no prior banning communicated to petitioner (Para 38 , 39)
15. failure to follow statutory procedures (Para 40 , 41)
16. input from railway board vigilance insufficient for delisting (Para 42 , 43 , 44)
17. delisting as a banning action requiring notice (Para 45 , 46 , 47)
18. petition maintainable despite existence of alternative remedy (Para 48 , 49 , 50)
19. mandatory