SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to tax assessment order (Para 1)
2. violation of procedural fairness in tax assessment (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. discretion in granting personal hearings in tax cases (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. importance of personal hearing in faceless assessments (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. mandatory nature of personal hearing under section 144b (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. assessee's right to personal hearing upheld (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
7. order to set aside and remand the assessment (Para 26)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.

1. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the action of respondent No.3 in passing the impugned final assessment order dated 27th November, 2021 under Section 143 (3) of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 [for short `the Act'] and the impugned notice dated 27th November, 2021 under Section 156 of the Act for Assessment Year 2018-19.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER

2. Mr. Arvind Datar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner stated that the impugned orders have been passed arbitrarily, without following the principles of natural justice and in gross violation of the scheme of faceless assessment under Section 144B of the Act,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top