Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Satish Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 1633 of 2021 & CM Appl. 9487 of 2021
Decided On : 14-01-2022
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)
1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
2. Petitioner seeks a direction not to disconnect the electricity supply of the petitioner being supplied by CA No.100140195 and further seeks rectification of electricity bill of Rs.17,64,520/-.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a small establishment and highly inflated bills have been raised. He submits that after the filing of the petition approximately a sum of Rs.3,78,485/- has been paid towards the disputed bill.
4. Respondents have sought to justify the bill in their counter affidavit.
5. It is observed that the dispute pertains to the merits of the bill and the computation which would be within the domain of the Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum.
6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum and file an petition within a period of four weeks from today with the said forum.
7. Subject to petitioner filing the petition before the CGRF within a period of four weeks, no further coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner till the petition is taken up by the CGRF for consideration.
8. It is clarified that the protection granted to the petitioner shall cease on the petition being taken by the CGRF and continuance of protection thereafter would be subject to orders to be passed by CGRF, if any.
9. It is clarified that this Court has neither considered nor commented upon the merits of the contention of either party and CGRF would be at liberty to dispose of the petition in accordance with law without being influenced by anything stated herein.
10. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.
AI
Disputes regarding inflated electricity bills must be resolved by the Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum, with interim protection against disconnection until the forum adjudicates.
Balancing the need for electricity with disputed bills, entitlement to free electricity under the scheme of Government of NCT of Delhi, and the jurisdiction of the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum.
Consumers have the right to dispute billing irregularities and seek restoration of services while fulfilling certain conditions, including payments in installments.
The court emphasized the necessity for proper communication of revised bills by the Electricity Board and the implications of consumer disputes on revenue recovery.
The Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum lacks jurisdiction to revise energy bills or grant subsidies, which are matters for the Government of Maharashtra.
The Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum lacks jurisdiction to direct revisions of energy bills and grant subsidies, which fall under the authority of the Government of Maharashtra.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
