SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Times Internet Limited - Appellant
Versus
ALT Digital Media Entertainment Ltd. - Respondent
CS(COMM) 454 of 2019 & I.As. 11576 of 2019 and 11423 of 2020
Decided On : 17-12-2021




Court acknowledges binding Settlement Agreement and permits full court fee refund as per established precedents.

Headnote:(A) Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 14 - Plaintiff seeks a decree of specific performance which has been resolved through mutual settlement. The court confirms that the Settlement Agreement dated 09.12.2021 is binding on both parties. (Paras 1, 3, 6, 7)

(B) Refund of Court Fees - The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of entire court fees based on precedents. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance against the defendant, which was referred to mediation, leading to a mutual settlement confirmed in the Settlement Agreement dated 09.12.2021.

Findings of Court:
The suit is disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement, and the plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fees.

Issues: Whether the settlement reached between the parties is enforceable and the justification for court fee refund.

Ratio Decidendi: The court recognized the binding nature of the Settlement Agreement and confirmed the entitlement to refund court fees as established in prior cases.

Result: Present suit and applications disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement.

Table of Content
1. filing of suit and mediation settlement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. counsels submit agreement terms. (Para 4 , 5)
3. conclusion and disposal of suit. (Para 6 , 7 , 11)
4. reference to prior legal decisions. (Para 8)
5. entitlement to court fees refund. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of specific performance in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

2. Vide order dated 20.07.2021, the matter was referred to Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (SAMADHAN) for making an effort to amicably resolve their disputes.

3. This court is informed that the parties have mutually settled their disputes and the terms of the settlement have been incorporated in Settlement Agreement dated 09.12.2021, which is duly signed by both the sides/parties. The aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 09.12.2021 has come on record.

4. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits the terms of settlement are incorporated in the aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 09.12.2021 and the present suit be disposed of.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of defendant submits that the defendant undertakes to abide by the terms of aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 09.12.2021.

6. Accordingly, the present suit is disposed of in terms of Settlement agreement dated 09.12.2021.

7. Needless to say, parties shall remain bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 09.12.2021.

8. At this stage, learned counsel for the plaintiff prays for refund of entire court fee.

9. On the aspect of refund of court fees, relying upon decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Afcons Infrastructure Limited v. Cherian Varkey Construction Company Private Limited, (2010) 8 SCC 24, a Division Bench of this Court in Nutan Batra Vs. M/s. Buniyaad Associates, 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12916 had allowed an appeal against the order of refusal of refund of entire court fee in a suit. Further, a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Munish Kalra Vs. Kiran Madan and Others, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8021 taking into account the fact that the dispute stands amicably settled between the parties, had relied upon decisions in Afcons Infrastructure Limited (Supra) and Nutan Batra (Supra) and directed refund of the entire court fees.

10. In view of aforesaid decisions, this Court finds that the plaintiff is entitled to refund of entire court fees. Registry is directed to issue necessary certificate/authorization in favour of the plaintiff to seek refund before the appropriate authorities.

11. In view of above, present suit and pending applications are accordingly disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top