SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Securitrans India (P.) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Prasad – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to termination of workmen after inquiry (Para 2 , 3)
2. management's concern about preliminary issue framing (Para 4 , 5)
3. importance of deciding validity of domestic inquiry first (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. agreement on framing validity of inquiry as preliminary issue (Para 10 , 11)
5. direction for labour court to adjudicate preliminary issue (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done in physical Court. Hybrid mode is permitted in cases where permission is being sought from the Court.

2. These are six petitions filed by the Petitioner-Management (hereinafter "Management") challenging the order dated 22nd November, 2021 passed by the Labour Court in LIR No.2920/19, 2921/19, 2922/19, 2023/19, 2925/19 & 2926/19 whereby an application which was filed by the Management for framing of an additional issue in the proceedings before the Labour Court, and for deciding the said issue as a preliminary issue was partly allowed.

3. In this matter, the Respondents-Workmen (hereinafter "Workmen"), who were working with the Petitioner at various ATMs, were terminated after a disciplinary inquiry was held by the Petitioner. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top