DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Ashav Advisory LLP – Appellant
Versus
Patanjali Ayurveda Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of parties involved (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. overview of mou-i and mou-ii (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. claim of rights and obligations under mous (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. respondents' denial of arbitration agreement (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. arguments about the nature of agreements (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. discussion on claims and requirements for arbitration (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. court's examination on the arbitration agreement (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. contextual understanding of mou-i terms (Para 27 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 9. details of funding and claims by ashav (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 10. relationship and adjustments between mous (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 11. incorporation of previous agreements in mou-ii (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 12. legal interpretation of incorporation clauses (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 13. group of companies doctrine applicability (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 14. evidence of shared intent among parties (Para 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 15. existence of arbitration agreement discussion (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66) |
| 16. decision on arbitration appointment (Para 67 , 68 , 69) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner has filed the present peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.