SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Rajinder Pershad – Appellant
Versus
Ram Niwas – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. The present second appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 18th November, 2019 passed by the ld. ADJ-VII (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter, "Appellate Court") in RCA No.11/2019 titled Sh. Rajinder Pershad v. Sh. Ved Prakash v. Ram Niwas & Ors. By the impugned order, the Appellate Court has dismissed the first appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 30th January, 2016 passed by the Ld. Civil Judge-14, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter, "Trial Court") in Suit No.38/15 titled Sh. Rajender Pershad & Ors. v. Ram Niwas & Ors. Therefore, in effect, the Appellate Court and the Trial Court have arrived at concurrent findings.

3. The dispute in the present case is between the legal heirs of the brothers i.e., Sh. Udey Ram, Sh. Teeka Ram, Sh. Tokh Ram, Sh. Ram Niwas & Sh. Yad Ram, who are all sons of Pt. Har Lal. The Plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Sh. Udey Ram. A suit for partition was filed by the Plaintiffs seeking partition and permanent injunction. The reliefs sought in the said suit are as under:

    "i) a decree for partition be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top