SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan – Appellant
Versus
Komendra Prakash Gautam – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to the tribunal's interim order (Para 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's argument regarding status quo (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's procedural directions to the tribunal (Para 7 , 8)
4. final disposal of the writ petition (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (ORAL):-

CM APPL. 7980/2022

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 2781/2022

2. This writ petition is directed against the interim order dated 25.10.2021, as extended by orders dated 11.11.2021 and 21.12.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short "the Tribunal"] in O.A. No.2108/2021.

3. We may note that, before instituting the above-captioned petition, respondent no.1 [i.e., the original applicant] had approached this court by way of another writ petition i.e., W.P.(C) No.11469/2021. At that point in time, with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the said writ petition was disposed of at the admission stage itself.

3.1. In the aforesaid writ petition, respondent no.1 had approached the court against an interlocutory order dated 27.09.2021, passed by the Tribunal in the very same O.A. i.e., O.A. No. 2108

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top