Amit Goyal vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Amit Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. bail application under specific sections of the cr.p.c. (Para 1 , 7)
2. arguments for and against the bail application. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. court's consideration of facts and previous proceedings. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
4. granting of bail subject to conditions. (Para 11)
5. conclusion on the bail application. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT

(VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the applicant seeking regular bail in FIR No. 229/2013 registered under Sections 420 /467/468/471/34 IPC at P.S. Uttam Nagar, Delhi.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that during the pendency of the regular bail proceedings before the Court below, a settlement was arrived at with the complainant, wherefore a sum of Rs.23 lacs was paid to him by the applicant. He also submitted that the applicant has already joined the investigation.

3. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, duly assisted by learned counsel for the complainant, vehemently opposed the bail application. It was submitted that the applicant, along with his brother, i.e. accused/Deepak Goel, is part

Click Here to Read the rest of this document