SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Christian Michel James – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of case background and charges (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding prior acquittal and extradition concerns (Para 9 , 19)
3. examining the merits of claims regarding prior trials and their legal implications (Para 10 , 12 , 15 , 18)
4. legal principles applicable to bail considerations (Para 11 , 24 , 27)
5. final decision on bail application (Para 41 , 42 , 43)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the applicant seeking regular bail in FIR/RC No. 217-2013-A-0003 registered under Section 120B read with Section 420 IPC and Sections 7/8/9/12/13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter, referred to as the `PC Act') by the respondent.

2. The brief facts of the case, as discernible from the material placed on record, are that on the basis of disclosure made by the then Head of External Relations of M/s Finmeccanica [holding company of M/s Agusta Westland International Ltd. (hereinafter, referred to as `AWIL')], Italian authorities began investigation in the year 2011 regarding payment of bribes through middlemen Guido Ralph Haschke and t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top