SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Akhil Bhartiya Kayastha Mahasabha – Appellant
Versus
Akhil Bhartiya Kayastha Mahasabha – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. None appears for the parties.

3. The present petition challenges the order dated 23rd January, 2020 in CS(COMM) 181/2019 titled Akhil Bhartiya Kayastha Mahasabha v. Yogendra Nath Srivastava passed by the Ld. District Judge (Commercial Court), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter "Commercial Court"). Vide the said order, the Commercial Court has held that the dispute raised in the suit is not a commercial dispute within the meaning of section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter "Act"). The Commercial Court reasoned that since the Petitioner/Plaintiff society is not involved in any trade or commercial activities and is only rendering social services there would be no transaction in the present suit which would fall in the category of commercial dispute. The relevant extract of the impugned order reads as under:

    "A conjoint reading of Section 2(c)(i) with Section 2(c)(xvii) and the statement of objects and reasons shows that the commercial courts are to deal with the commercial dispute especially those engaged in trade and commerce. The plaintiff is not stated to be invol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top