JUDGMENT

[Physical Court Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)--This writ petition is directed against the order dated 10.10.2018, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short "the Tribunal"] in T.A./100/32/2013.

1.1. While disposing of the aforesaid TA, the Tribunal passed the following operative directions, which are contained in paragraph 6 of the impugned order:

"6. We, therefore, dispose of this OA leaving it open to the applicant to make a representation mentioning the consequential benefits, which he was entitled to in terms of the directions in OA 1950/2007 (supra) within a period of four weeks from today. On receipt of such representation, the respondents shall pass appropriate orders within three months thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs."

2. As is evident, the Tribunal had given leave to the petitioner to make a representation qua consequential benefits, in terms of the directions issued in OA No.1950/2007.

3