SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Alexis Global Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Oma Living Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. arbitration petition filed under section 11. (Para 1)
2. respondent's objections on maintainability due to stamping issues. (Para 2)
3. court's analysis on stamping requirements for arbitration. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. decision on the respondent's stamp duty objection. (Para 10)
5. petition allowed and appointment of sole arbitrator. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT

[VIA HYBRID MODE]

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--The present petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter, `the Act'], seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes arising out of/pertaining to a `Service Agreement' dated 05th December, 2018 which contains an arbitration clause.

2. The Respondent does not dispute the existence of the arbitration agreement, but opposes the maintainability of the present petition, primarily on the ground that the Service Agreement is not sufficiently stamped as per the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. In this regard, counsel for the Respondent submits that although, he is aware that this Court in IMZ Corporate Pvt. Ltd. v. MSD Telematics, 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3016 has take

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top