SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Orissa Concrete and Allied Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. By these two petitions, the petitioner seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (`Act' in short) to arbitrate the disputes between the parties.

2. According to the petitioner, the respondent No. 1 awarded the work of manufacturing of sleepers to the petitioner vide letter dated 17th October 2013. The original delivery period for completing the supply against the subject contract was two years and thirty days and the total number of sleepers to be supplied were 1,40,750 at the rate of Rs.1589/- each. Thus, the total value of the contract was Rs.22,36,51,750/-. According to the petitioner, the sleepers were manufactured as per the specifications prescribed by the respondents. Further before the sleepers were dispatched the same were duly approved by the officials of the respondents. The officials of CBI visited the manufacturing unit of the petitioner at Kapa on 10th October 2014 followed by the termination of the contract by the respondents vide their letter dated 18th November 2014. The petitioner thus invoked arbitration in respect of the illegal termination of the contract and claim in respect of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top