SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Usha Vijay – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. probate of will and familial relations (Para 1 , 2)
2. objections raised against will (Para 3 , 5 , 6)
3. analysis of witnesses and evidence concerning will (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. validity of will confirmed by court (Para 15 , 17)
5. appeal dismissed; future considerations open (Para 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. Appellant impugns Judgment dated 23.11.2019 whereby the Trial Court has granted probate to the Executor of the Will dated 22.11.1997 of Late Smt. Sushila Khanna.

2. Both Appellant (Smt. Usha Vijay) and Respondent No. 2 (Smt. Uma Varma) are real sisters and daughters of Late Smt. Sushila Khanna.

3. Respondent No. 2 applied for grant of Probate contending that she was appointed as the executor of the Will by her late mother. The Will is stated to have been attested by the respective husband's of the Appellant and the Respondent No. 2. Appellant filed objections to the said Will.

4. The Trial Court has dismissed the objections and held that the Will has been duly signed by the Testatrix and has been duly attested and that she was having a sound disposing and consequently the Will has been duly proved and as such granted t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top