Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Amrish Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Gurchait Singh Chima – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case context and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's denial and claim of forged document. (Para 3 , 14) |
| 3. details of negotiations and transactions related to property. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. arbitration process initiated and court orders. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. expert testimony regarding forgeries. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. petitioner's arguments against arbitration. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. court's findings on specific performance and the legitimacy of the agreement. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 8. conclusion on the dismissal of the petition. (Para 66 , 67 , 68) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the `A&C Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 17.12.2020 (hereafter the `impugned award') delivered by an Arbitral Tribunal constituted by Justice (Retired) Manmohan Sarin, former Chief Justice of Jammu and Kashmir High Court as the Sole Arbitrator (hereafter the `Arbitral Tribunal').
2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to an alleged Agreement to Sell d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
