SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Vistrat Real Estates Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Asian Hotels North Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition for appointment of arbitrator. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. objections to arbitration due to third-party claims. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. doctrine of competence-competence in arbitration. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. court orders appointment of arbitrator. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT

1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short `the Act').

2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner purchased the ground 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th floors of New Tower, Bhikaji Cama Place, R. K. Puram, New Delhi along with the respective car parking areas at the Hyatt Complex from the respondent vide four registered Sale Deeds dated 12th May, 2014 (in short the Agreements) along with perpetual right to use car parking area.

3. The petitioner transferred and assigned all rights and title in the premises to IndusInd Bank Limited along with perpetual right to use car parking area. Thereafter, the petitioner sought refund of the security deposit of Rs.15 Crores deposited by the petitioner pursuant to Refundable Security Deposit Agreement entered into

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top