SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Springboard Solutions Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Finaxar Technology Solutions Private Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. disputes referred to arbitration. (Para 1)
2. consent to arbitration by parties. (Para 2 , 3)
3. arbitrator's duties and fee structure. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. petition disposed of. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. Petitioner seeks reference of disputes to arbitration pursuant to clause 15.8 of Annexure-2 to the Coworking Letter dated 01.07.2019.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that without prejudice to their rights and contentions, they have no objection to the disputes being referred to arbitration.

3. Learned counsel for parties pray that parties be referred to Delhi International Arbitration Centre.

4. In view of the above, the disputes are referred to the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), which would appoint an arbitrator to arbitrate the disputes. The arbitration shall take place under the aegis of the DIAC in accordance with its rules and regulations.

5. The arbitrator would be entitled to charge fees in accordance with the schedule of fee stipulated by the DIAC.

6. The arbitrator shall furnish the requisite disclosure under section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within one week of entering ref

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top