SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
K. Udayananda Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


ORDER

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)--The present writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter, referred to as the "Code") praying for quashing the case FIR No. 93/2021 registered at PS - EOW, Tilak Marg against the Petitioner under Sections 406/420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. The brief facts of the case, as per the prosecution, are that the present FIR was lodged on 3rd July 2021, under the provisions as mentioned above, on the complaint of Sh. Atul Kant Chaturvedi s/o Sh. P.N. Chaturvedi, Authorised Representative of M/s Perfect Synergy Advisory Pvt, having its registered office at 1501, Chiranjiv Tower, 43, Nehru Place, New Delhi.

3. The Complainant alleged that accused persons approached and represented to him that their company M/s Sagar Infra Rail International Limited is involved in Lucrative Railway Projects for Indian Railway having govt. clients and international projects in Dubai etc. They further conveyed to him that they were getting Rs.100 Crores from their clients within 6 to 9 months for their work done on the projects

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top