Kinri Dhir vs Veer Singh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Kinri Dhir – Appellant
Versus
Veer Singh – Respondent

Table of Content
1. institution of contempt petition due to non-compliance of court orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6)
2. discussion on maintaining contempt jurisdiction over non-compliance assertions. (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12)
3. definition and requirements for proving civil contempt. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
4. analysis of the respondent's compliance with the court orders. (Para 19 , 25)
5. final orders regarding non-compliance and expectations for future compliance. (Para 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. The instant contempt petition has been filed for wilful disobedience of the Order dated 09.11.2021 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court (South-East), Saket Courts, New Delhi, in G.P. No.16/2021.

2. Facts, in brief, leading to the instant contempt petition are as follows:

a) It is stated that on 04.12.2018, the Petitioner/wife and the Respondent No.1/husband underwent matrimonial ceremony in Taiwan and a male child was born to them.

b) It was alleged that Respondent No.1/husband committed grave acts of mental, sexual, emotional, economic & physical abuse against the Petitioner/wife. It is stated that in June 2020, Respondent No.1/husband moved the Petitioner/wife

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSUBRAMONIUM PRASADKinri Dhir – AppellantVersusVeer Singh – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Kinri Dhir – Appellant
Versus
Veer Singh – Respondent