SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Pradeep Vinod Construction Co. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks arbitration appointment. (Para 1)
2. disputes referred to arbitration, previous award set aside. (Para 2 , 3)
3. respondent's delay in submitting reply noted. (Para 4 , 5)
4. case merits fresh arbitration appointment. (Para 6)
5. arbitrator appointed and fees determined. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
6. petition disposed of as ordered. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

1. Petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal pursuant to a Contract Agreement dated 05.09.2013.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the disputes arising out of the said agreement were referred to an Arbitral Tribunal and the Arbitral Tribunal rendered an award dated 01.10.2018.

3. Learned counsel submits that the objections to the award were sustained and the award was set aside by order dated 06.10.2021. In those circumstances, fresh arbitration has been invoked and accordingly the disputes are required to be referred to an Arbitral Tribunal.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent prays for an adjournment. He submits that reply has been drafted and sent for signatures.

5. It is observed that the notice was issued on 10.02.2022 and thereafter on 14.03.2022resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top