Sushil Arora vs Governement of NCT of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, NAVIN CHAWLA
Sushil Arora – Appellant
Versus
Governement of NCT of Delhi – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioner's challenge to notification authority. (Para 1)
2. notification's effect on appointment powers. (Para 2 , 3)
3. clarification on power of appointment under section 3. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. definitions of 'appointment' and definitions in dictionaries. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. constitutional control of high court over judiciary. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. preservation of judicial independence. (Para 17 , 18)
7. appointment by designation under section 3. (Para 19)
8. dismissal of the petition. (Para 20)

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, ACJ. (Oral)

1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the Notification No. F.6(33)/2009-Judl./1125-1131 dated 15.09.2010 issued by the Lieutenant Governor of NCT of Delhi to the extent that it confers powers of Presiding Officer of the Designated Court and Special Court constituted, inter alia, under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') to each and every Officer of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service, to be exercisable by each of them with effect from the date of assumption of charge of the post of Presiding Officer or Judge of the Designated Court or Special Court,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTVIPIN SANGHI, NAVIN CHAWLASushil Arora – AppellantVersusGovernement of NCT of Delhi – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, NAVIN CHAWLA
Sushil Arora – Appellant
Versus
Governement of NCT of Delhi – Respondent