IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Jagjeet Singh - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
Arb.P. 64 of 2022, Arb.P. 65 of 2022, Arb.P. 66 of 2022 and Arb.P. 67 of 2022
Decided On : 09-05-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reference to arbitration is sought. (Para 1) |
| 2. disputes regarding payments and claims. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. parties referred to arbitration due to outstanding disputes. (Para 6) |
| 4. appointment of sole arbitrator and fee structure. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. petitions allowed based on above terms. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. Petitioner seeks reference of disputes to an Arbitral Tribunal to be constituted in accordance with Clause 25 of the General Conditions of Contract between the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the final bills submitted by the petitioner have been verified and approved for payment. She submits that in one case payment of Rs.37,33,565/- has already been disbursed and balance payment of Rs.79,09,179/- in the remaining three contracts has been cleared and shall be paid subject to availability of funds.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the said payment, the disputes still survive as some of the claims have been rejected and some claims have been cleared for lesser amount and even the approved payments have not been released. Besides this there is also a claim for interest on delayed payments.
4. Learned Counsel for the respondent disputes the claims of the Petitioner.
5. However, learned Counsel for the parties submit that though the work orders are different, common questions would arise for consideration in all the cases.
6. Since the contentions of the petitioner is that some of the claims have been rejected and some claims have been short paid and there is also claim for interest, I am of the view that the disputes between the parties still survive and thus parties are liable to be referred to arbitration. Since, it is contended that common issues may arise for consideration in all the petitions, I am of the view that interest of justice requires that the disputes be referred to one Arbitrator.
7. Accordingly, without prejudice to their rights and contentions of the parties, Mr. Baljeet Singh Dhir, Advocate (Mobile No. +91 98110 88103; Email: bsdhir@hotmail.com; Chamber No. 336, Lawyers Chambers Block I, Delhi High Court, New Delhi) is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator in all the petitions to adjudicate the claims and counter claims, if any, of the parties.
8. The fees of the learned Arbitrator shall be as per the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
9. The Arbitrator shall furnish the requisite disclosure under section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within two weeks of entering reference.
10. Petitions are allowed in the above terms.
The court ruled that disputes over rejected and delayed payments warrant arbitration, appointing a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the claims in the interest of justice.
Disputes arising from a work agreement must be referred to arbitration when an arbitration clause exists, regardless of claims under consideration.
Parties may consent to arbitration for disputes arising from contractual obligations, with specific provisions for arbitrator fees and necessary disclosures as per applicable law.
Parties can mutually consent to refer disputes to arbitration despite disagreements on pre-arbitration steps taken.
Court affirmed the validity of arbitration clauses for dispute resolution when parties agree, even after unsuccessful negotiations.
The court facilitates arbitration referral based on mutual consent of the parties, adhering to the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Consent of both parties suffices to refer disputes to arbitration, as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, despite claims of superseding agreements.
Parties may mutually agree to refer disputes to arbitration, preserving the right to counterclaims while resolving contractual disputes.
The court ruled that mutual consent between the parties allows for the appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, with stipulations on fees and disclosures.
Parties may consent to an alternative arbitration method despite specified procedures in their agreement, thus allowing for flexibility in dispute resolution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.