SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Bharat Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition for anticipatory bail under section 438 cr.pc. (Para 1 , 2)
2. dispute over evidence and petitioner's cooperation. (Para 3 , 4)
3. denial of anticipatory bail due to gravity of offense. (Para 5)

ORDER

Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. This is an application under Section 438 Cr.PC filed on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.193/2021 under Sections 408/394/397/365/302/201/34 of IPC at Police Station Mundka.

2. In brief, the case was initially registered under Section 408 IPC on the complaint of one Sanjay Kumar, who alleged that he is working as transporter in the name of Om Roadlines and on 22.03.2021, he got loaded 18176 kgs of steel coils costing about Rs.28,62,386/- in truck bearing No. HR-38 T 8482. The truck driver Ravi Yadav (deceased) did not reach the destination at Wazirpur and Jahangirpuri and was untraceable. During investigation, the truck was located in empty condition. Further, accused Deepak was arrested who disclosed about commission of offence along with Sher Bahadur, Rajesh @ Kana and Rakesh @ Bakra.

Accused Sher Bahadur as well as petitioner Bharat Sharma communicated on the night of 22-23.03.2021. The accused al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top