SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Prachi Kumari - Appellant
Versus
ITBP - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8386 of 2022
Decided On : 26-05-2022




In cases of conflicting medical opinions regarding fitness, courts must ensure a fair process through re-examination to uphold the right to a just outcome.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14 - Medical examination - The petitioner challenged the decision declaring her unfit during medical examination and sought a review citing conflicting medical opinions. The court directed a Medical Board to re-examine the petitioner within a week - The outcome of the re-examination shall be final and determinative of her eligibility for the selection process. (Paras 6-7)

(B) Administrative law - Right to fair process - The court emphasized the right to a fair re-examination process where discrepancies in medical opinions exist, ensuring that the applicant has a clear opportunity for redress. (Para 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner contested her classification as unfit after a medical examination based on suspected early respiratory issues, despite a subsequent negative Covid test. Two conflicting medical opinions led to the petition.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the constitution of a Medical Board to conduct a re-examination of the petitioner, emphasizing the fair process to be followed in determining her fitness.

Issues: The key issues included the validity and reliability of medical assessments and the right to a fair re-evaluation before a definitive decision is made regarding eligibility.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the necessity of a thorough and impartial medical examination in cases of conflicting medical opinions to ensure fairness in administrative decisions.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. conclusion and final order issued. (Para 1 , 2 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. petitioner's request for medical review. (Para 3 , 6)
3. court's acceptance of respondent's notice. (Para 4 , 5)
4. court's directive for re-examination. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM APPL. 25242/2022 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 8386/2022 & CM APPL. 25241/2022 (stay)

3. By way of the present writ petition, petitioner seeks following reliefs:

a) to set-aside the decision dated 02.05.2022 of the respondent No. 1 declaring the petitioner as Unfit:

b) to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to participate in the Documents Verification to be conducted:

c) to direct the respondent No.1 to place on record the medical record of the petitioner;

d) to direct the respondents to medically re-examine the petitioner within a time bound manner;

e) to direct the respondents to stay the process of recruitment until the present petition is disposed;

f) to direct the respondents to reserve seats for the petitioner in the merit list which may be prepared during the pendency of the present Petition;

g) to direct the respondents to subject the final result which may be declared to the outcome of the present petition.

4. Notice issued.

5. Learned Senior Panel Counsel for respondents accepts notice.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the Detailed Medical Examination, the petitioner was found as unfit due to Hazy B/L lower lobe with Prominent Vascular marking (? Covid Infection). Thereafter, the petitioner opted for Review of Medical Examination before the Review Medical Board of the respondent no. 1, which referred her to a laboratory named Focus Imaging and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., Delhi. After her examination at the Focus Imaging and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., Delhi, the petitioner was declared Covid negative. However, in the Review Medical Examination, based on a medical split opinion dated 01.05.2022, the petitioner was finally declared as unfit on the ground of Early Small airway obstruction.

7. Since, there are two different medical opinions and without going into the controversy, whether the petitioner is unfit or fit, we hereby direct the Incharge, R.R. Hospital to constitute a Medical Board to re-conduct the medical test of the petitioner within one week from today. The date of test shall be conveyed to the petitioner in advance, who shall appear before the said Medical Board on the date so fixed. It is made clear that if the petitioner is found medically fit by the Medical Board so constituted, she shall be allowed to join the selection process and in case, she is declared unfit, no further opportunity shall be granted to her and report of said Medical Board shall be considered final, since, the same have been admitted by the petitioner.

8. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition stands disposed of.

9. Pending application also stands disposed of.

10. Copy of this order be given dasti under signature of Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top