SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Nizamuddin Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. anticipatory bail application and delay in filing the fir (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. seriousness of allegations and considerations for bail (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. factors for considering anticipatory bail (Para 10 , 11)
4. conditions for granting bail and final order (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.A. 10632/2022 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 1647/2022

3. The instant application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail in FIR bearing No. 201/2022, registered at Police Station Jamia Nagar, for offences punishable under Sections 376D/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

4. It is stated by the complainant, who is the real sister of the petitioner, that she has lodged a complaint with Police Station, Jamia Nagar and thereupon an FIR No. 201/2022 under Section 376D/506/34 IPC was registered on 25.4.2022. The incident in question has allegedly taken place on 10.3.2019. When a query was put to the learned counsel for the complainant, who is present in Court and who is assisting th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top