DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Rajesh Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
Office of the Ld. Principal District and Sessions Judge – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for leave and challenges to circular. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of leave application process. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments based on constitutional violations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. discussion of proportionality test regarding restrictions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. counterarguments regarding leave conditions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. respondent's assertions and defense in counter affidavit. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. summary of respondent's procedural justifications. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. court's analysis of circular applicability. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 9. key issues and grounds of challenge summarized. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 10. review of circular and rationale for denial. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 11. court's examination of discrimination claims. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 12. legal precedents cited and their relevance. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 13. final ruling and dismissal of the petition. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 14. conclusion asserting lack of merit in claims. (Para 43 , 44) |
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J.
CM APPL. 12369/2022 (by respondent seeking condonation of 13 days delay in filing the counter affidavit)
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is all
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.