SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Satish Mohan Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks quashing of fir and charges. (Para 1 , 2)
2. allegations of cheating related to property sale. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. pending revisions and procedural considerations. (Para 6 , 10)
4. defense arguments against allegations of cheating. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. court's analysis of mou and documentary evidence. (Para 11 , 12 , 15)
6. judicial caution against misuse of criminal proceedings. (Para 16 , 17 , 19)
7. discussion of criteria for quashing fir. (Para 18 , 20 , 21)
8. quashing of fir based on legal findings. (Para 22)
9. final orders and disposition of petitions. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT

1. The accused/Satish Mohan Aggarwal before the learned Trial Court, has filed Crl.M.C.1933/2020 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, "Cr.P.C.") seeking the quashing of FIR No. 41/2012, registered at Police Station Pahar Ganj, Delhi under Sections 420/467/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, "IPC"). He has also filed Crl.Rev.P.56/2021 against the orders dated 12th November, 2020 of the learned Trial Court whereby charge against him has been framed for offence under Section 420 read with Section 34 IPC, though the charge-sheet fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top