SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1450

N. S. SHEKHAWAT
Deepak Dagar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Partap Singh, Mr. Rajinder Singh Banku DAG, Haryana

Table of Content
1. details of the alleged fraudulent transactions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments discussing the nature of the claims and allegations. (Para 3 , 4)
3. legal foundations regarding misuse of criminal proceedings. (Para 6 , 10)
4. court’s decision to quash the fir based on civil nature of dispute. (Para 12 , 16)

Judgment

Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, J.

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., with a prayer to quash the FIR No. 430 dated 06.08.2022 under Sections 420 , 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Nuh, District Nuh and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. The FIR in the present case was registered on the basis of the complaint moved by Somesh Mittal son of Vinod Mittal. In the FIR (Annexure P-1), the complainant had levelled the following allegations separately:-

(i) Deepak Dagar, petitioner No. 1/accused was the owner in possession of 121 Kanals 14 Marlas of land at village Uzina, Tehsil and District Nuh in view of the agreement to sell in his favour. In fact, Shiv Om, Hari Om and Kapil sons of Ranbir Singh had executed an agreement in favour of Deepak Dagar. On 26.07.2021, Deepak Dagar agreed to sell the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top