IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Connoisseur Foods Hospitality Services - Appellant
Versus
Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Limited - Respondent
TR.P.(C.) 14 of 2022 & CM Appl. 12990 of 2022 (stay)
Decided On : 01-06-2022
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--Present petition under Section 24 of CPC has been filed by the petitioner for transfer of the execution petition No. 914 of 2019 titled Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Limited Vs M/s Connoisseur Food and Hospitality Service, pending in the Court of Sh. Nikhil Chopra, ADJ, South, Saket Court, New Delhi to the Court of Sh. Gurvinder Pal Singh, ADJ, Commercial Court, Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
2. It has been stated that the learned District Judge, Commercial Court, Patiala House is already dealing OMP(COMM.) No.150/2019 whereby the objections under Section 34 has been filed by the petitioner. It is an admitted case that both the proceedings have arisen out of the same Award.
3. The respondent/non-applicant is objecting to the transfer of the execution petition predominantly on two grounds. Firstly, the execution petition was filed in the year 2019 and the applicant petitioner had been appearing before Saket Court but this plea was never taken. It has been stated that the Court now at Saket was about to execute the Award and therefore the present application has been moved only to delay the proceedings.
4. It is a matter of record that the respondent despite opportunity having been given has not filed reply to the application. Section 24 of the CPC confers power upon the High Court to transfer any suit, appeal or other proceedings pending before it for trial or disposal to any Court subordinate to it and competent to try or dispose of the same. Section 24 (2) provides that where any suit or proceeding has been transferred or withdrawn under sub-Section (1), the transferee court may subject to any special direction in the case of an order of transfer, either retry it or proceed from the point at which it was transferred or withdrawn. Thus, Section 24 (2) makes it clear that in absence of any specific direction, the transferee court shall carry on the proceedings from the point at which it was transferred from the transferor court. Thus, the apprehension of the respondent regarding delay has no basis.
5. In these circumstances, the execution petition No. 914 of 2019 titled Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Limited Vs M/s Connoisseur Food and Hospitality Service, pending in the Court of Sh. Nikhil Chopra, ADJ, South, Saket Court, New Delhi is transferred to the Court of Sh. Gurvinder Pal Singh, ADJ, Commercial Court, Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
6. The execution petition shall be placed before the court of Sh. Gurinder Pal Singh, ADJ, Commercial Court, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi on 12th July, 2022 for disposal in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid directions, the petition along with pending application stands disposed of.
Court has the authority under Section 24 of the CPC to transfer proceedings between courts to ensure efficient handling and continuity of cases.
The High Court can transfer execution petitions within jurisdiction for judicial efficiency under Section 24 of the CPC and Article 227 of the Constitution.
Transfer of cases between courts must balance judicial efficiency and avoidance of conflicting judgments, emphasizing the importance of stages in proceedings.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the delineation of the jurisdiction of the Principal District Judge or the Chief Judge, City Civil Court in transferring cases, particularly in ....
The jurisdiction under Section 24 CPC is concurrent between the High Court and District Court, but a party cannot challenge a transfer order in both courts; they must choose one forum.
The jurisdiction under Section 24 CPC is concurrent between the High Court and District Court, but a party cannot challenge a transfer order in both courts; they must choose one forum for their remed....
Transfer of suits under Section 24 of CPC requires clear similarity of cause of action or parties; advanced stage of trial weighs against transfer.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the executing court does not have the authority to transfer execution proceedings to another state on its own motion, and such transfer can on....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.