SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Murari Mirchandani – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, "Cr.P.C.") for quashing the Notice dated 8th September, 2021, issued by the SDM, Hauz Khas, South District, New Delhi in case titled Raj Narayan Singh v. Jitendra Kumar Sardana & Anr., and for setting aside of the proceedings emanating from the said Notice.

2. The petitioner states that he is engaged in the business of real estate. The facts as pleaded by the petitioner are that property bearing bearing No. S-94, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi, measuring 499 square yards was leased by the Delhi Development Authority (for short, "DDA") to late Sh. Surender Kumar Sardana, vide Lease Deed dated 08th December, 1967, who died on 5th April, 2011, leaving behind his siblings, namely, Jitender Sardana (since deceased) respondent no. 3 herein, Sushma Diwan, Sushila Arora (since deceased) and Pushpa Mendiratta, as his legal heirs.

3. While the respondent no.3 approached the DDA on 2nd August, 2011 for mutation of the property in favour of the surviving legal heirs of Sh. Surender Kumar Sardana, a complaint was filed by the respondent No.2 claiming to have purchased the property fr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top