SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Shiv Lingam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. process of quashing bail cancellation (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding bail rights and change of circumstances (Para 4 , 5)
3. judicial considerations in bail applications (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. learning from judicial impropriety (Para 8 , 9)
5. concluding remarks on judicial discipline (Para 14 , 15)

ORDER

Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner has preferred the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the impugned order dated 07.06.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-09, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 06.04.2022 by the learned ACMM, Central, Delhi in FIR No.370/2020 under Section 448/451/467/468/471/34/IPC registered at PS: Patel Nagar has been cancelled under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C.

2. In brief, as per the case of the prosecution, the petitioner/accused in the present case committed trespass in the house of the complainant during her absence while they had gone to Gujarat due to Covid-19 in June, 2020. Further, the petitioner claimed possession on the strength of false and fabricated documents i.e. GPA dated 13.03.1985, GPA dated 14.12.1999, Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top