SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Manish Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Regisrar of Trade Marks – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of trademark opposition (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. court's reasoning on evidence submission issues (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 16)
3. arguments regarding evidence filing and compliance (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. determination of evidence filing validity (Para 17)
5. conclusion on costs and order disposal (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--The present writ petition arises out of the impugned orders dated 26th February, 2020, passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks, New Delhi/Respondent No.1 (hereinafter "Respondent No.1"), whereby it admitted the evidence in support of oppositions filed by M/s APJ Satya Knowledge LLP/Respondent No.2/Opponent (hereinafter "Opponent"). The Petitioner/Applicant -Mr. Manish Agarwal (hereinafter "Applicant") filed four applications bearing numbers 2493063, 2493064, 2493065 and 2493069 in Classes 16, 35, 36 and 35 respectively, for the trademarks `SATYA GROUP' in black and white, and in colour logo form. The said applications were filed on 11th March, 2013 with the Trademark Registry, Delhi. The said marks are represented as under:

    and

2. The marks were advertised in Trademark Journal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top