DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Manish Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Regisrar of Trade Marks – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of trademark opposition (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. court's reasoning on evidence submission issues (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 16) |
| 3. arguments regarding evidence filing and compliance (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. determination of evidence filing validity (Para 17) |
| 5. conclusion on costs and order disposal (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--The present writ petition arises out of the impugned orders dated 26th February, 2020, passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks, New Delhi/Respondent No.1 (hereinafter "Respondent No.1"), whereby it admitted the evidence in support of oppositions filed by M/s APJ Satya Knowledge LLP/Respondent No.2/Opponent (hereinafter "Opponent"). The Petitioner/Applicant -Mr. Manish Agarwal (hereinafter "Applicant") filed four applications bearing numbers 2493063, 2493064, 2493065 and 2493069 in Classes 16, 35, 36 and 35 respectively, for the trademarks `SATYA GROUP' in black and white, and in colour logo form. The said applications were filed on 11th March, 2013 with the Trademark Registry, Delhi. The said marks are represented as under:
and 
2. The marks were advertised in Trademark Journal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.