SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
www.dhanifinance.in - Respondent
CS(COMM) 673 of 2019
Decided On : 31-05-2022




The court established that the unauthorized use of identical trademarks constitutes infringement and passing off, justifying a permanent injunction and awarding damages to the rightful trademark owners.

Headnote:(A) Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 28 and 29(2) - Plaintiffs seek injunction against Defendant for trademark infringement and passing off related to trademarks 'Indiabulls' and 'Dhani' and the domain name www.dhanifinance.in - Plaintiffs established their ownership and use of the trademarks since 1994 - The Court found that Defendant's use of the trademarks was identical and capable of causing confusion, thus infringing the Plaintiffs' rights. (Paras 11-14)

(B) Passing Off - Court emphasized the test for passing off which requires showing of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage suffered by the Plaintiffs, finding that the Defendant’s actions satisfied these criteria. (Paras 16-17)

(C) Damages - The Court awarded punitive damages amounting to Rs.3,00,000/- in light of Defendant's absence and infringing actions. (Paras 20-21)

Facts of the case:
Plaintiffs, part of the renowned Indiabulls Group, successfully established their ownership of the trademarks since early 2000s and claimed that Defendant used identical marks to mislead consumers.

Findings of Court:
The trademarks and domain names used by the Defendant were found to infringe on the Plaintiffs’ rights and led to confusion, meriting an injunction and damages.

Issues: Whether the Defendant's use of the trademarks constituted infringement and passing off? Whether punitive damages were warranted?

Ratio Decidendi: The Court highlighted that the similarities between the respective trademarks were substantive and misleading to the public, thereby violating the exclusive rights of the Plaintiffs.

Result: The suit is decreed in favor of the Plaintiffs with permanent injunction and damages awarded.

Table of Content
1. plaintiffs' trademark ownership and use. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. court's observations on defendants' non-appearance. (Para 9 , 10)
3. legal standards for trademark infringement and passing off. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. defendants' restrictions and awarded damages. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
5. conclusion and confirmation of interim injunction. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Present suit has been filed by the Plaintiffs seeking permanent injunction restraining Defendant No. 1 and anyone acting on its behalf from using Plaintiffs' trademarks `Indiabulls', `Dhani', `Potli' (device mark) `', logo and the domain name www.indiabullsdhani.com, separately or in combination, in relation to its services, especially, financial and transactional, amounting to infringement, passing off, unfair competition, dilution as well as for delivery up and damages.

2. It is averred that Plaintiffs are part of the renowned Indiabulls Group of Companies and have an established presence in India as well as internationally, since 1994, as a financial services conglomerate. Combined revenue of the Indiabulls Group for the year 2017-2018 was over Rs.22,000 Crores, of which Plaintiffs No. 1 and 2 contributed to more than Rs.16,000 Crores.

3. It is further averred that Plaintiffs No. 1 and 3 are the registered proprietors of the trademark `INDIABULLS' in various classes including Class 36. Plaintiff No. 2 is the registered proprietor of the trademark `DHANI' and its variations in several classes, including classes 9 and 36, as well as registered proprietor of the trademark (device) `' in class 9. The trademark `DHANI' was conceptualised and coined by Plaintiff No. 2 for launching personal loans, finance and services application on the website www.indiabullsdhani.com and through a mobile application. Trademark `DHANI', with/without device is the essential part of various registered trademarks of the Plaintiffs and has been extensively and continuously used since 2017. Details of Plaintiffs' registrations for `DHANI' and/or bearing the device mark are furnished in the plaint.

4. It is further averred that Plaintiffs adopted the trademark `INDIABULLS' in January 2000 as part of their Corporate name as well as for their wide range of goods and services and have been continuously and extensively used since then. `INDIABULLS' is not only a trademark but a brand identity of the Plaintiffs and has been used with respect to financial and other services since inception of the Plaintiffs' companies. Plaintiffs have extensively promoted and advertised their trademarks. Promotional expenses for the years 2017-2019 are as under:

FINANCIAL YEAREXPENDITURE AMOUNT (INR)
2017-201947,24,92,990

5. It is averred that Plaintiffs make their services available online through the website having the domain name www.indiabullsdhani.com, which has been registered since 2017 and is fully operational. The domain name is exclusively associated with the Plaintiffs and the services provided by them and no other party has a right to adopt or use the same as a domain name or trademark in any manner, which is identical or deceptively similar to that of the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have been vigilant in protecting their registered trademarks against third parties and have an ex parte ad interim injunction in CS(COMM) 626/2019 as well as a decree in CS(COMM) 590/2017, in their favour.

6. It is further averred that Defendant No. 1 is operating a fake and fraudulent website under the domain name www.dhanifinance.in, through which it is offering financial services, similar to those of the Plaintiffs, to the consumers, under the Plaintiffs' trademarks `INDIABULLS', `DHANI', (device) and its variants. The said website displays Plaintiffs' trademarks as well as various details and information about Plaintiff No. 2, in order to mislead customers into believing that the said website is of the Plaintif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top